CHI/00HN/LSC/2022/0096
CHI/00HN/LSC/2022/0096 · service charges · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 28 Apr 2023
The tribunal found the leaseholders liable for a £190 drain unblocking charge but not liable for a £125 contribution towards solicitors' fees, and ordered the respondent company to refund £100 of tribunal fees.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Salterns Management 15/16 (RTM) Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | legal and professional fees |
| Total demanded | £19,990 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the applicants £100 towards tribunal fees of £300 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Respondent : Salterns Management 15/16 (RTM) Ltd
- years
1 September 2019 – 31 August 2020
- outcome
was no liable to pay a contribution of £125 towards legal fees.
- items reduced
was no liable to pay a contribution of £125 towards legal fees.
- total demanded
reasonableness of service charges totalling £19,990
- costs
The Tribunal Ordered the Respondent to reimburse the Applicants with £100 in connection with the Tribunal fees
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.