Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SW6 2RQ

Chelsea Creek Tower 12 Park Street London SW6 2RQ

LON/00AN/LDC/2024/0224 · dispensation from consultation · Hammersmith and Fulham · decided 18 Oct 2024

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the urgent replacement of a belt on the fire-fighting lift at Chelsea Creek Tower, but did not decide whether the works or cost were reasonable.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordSt George West London Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
comprises a purpose built block of fifty apartments above a commercial unit
freeholder
Applicant St George West London Limited
outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all of the consultation
s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all of the consultation requirements under S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.