Charter Quay, Kingston - upon - Thames KT1 1HS
LON/00AX/LSC/2020/0394 · service charges · Kingston upon Thames · decided 14 Apr 2021
The Tribunal decided that the cost of the façade remedial works recommended in the expert's report is payable by leaseholders as service charges in the proportions set out in the leases.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | CQRA Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate, 237 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Applicant owns the freehold of the site which consists of 237 leasehold flats across 4 blocks.
- freeholder
The Applicant owns the freehold of the site which consists of 237 leasehold flats across 4 blocks.
- outcome
the reasonable cost of the works set out in the 98 page report of Façade Remedial Consultants dated 17th February 2020, and which are to be carried out to the property, are service charges payable by the leaseholders in the contractual proportions set out in the long leases to each flat.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.