Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near E14 9AY

Charrington Tower, New Providence Wharf, London, E14 9AY

LON/00BG/LDC/2024/0074 · dispensation from consultation · Tower Hamlets · decided 19 Jun 2024

The Tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the replacement of heating pressurisation units at Charrington Tower, but made no finding that the scope or cost of the works is reasonable, so leaseholders can still challenge the costs later under section 27A.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not clear
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordLandor (Dundee Wharf) Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 360 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputemajor works
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
a 43-storey block containing 360 private residential units
freeholder
Landor (Dundee Wharf) Limited, the First Applicant is the registered freehold proprietor of the property.
outcome
The Tribunal granted the application for the following main reasons:
s20
The Tribunal granted the application for the following main reasons:

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.