Charlton Lawn, Cudnall Street, Charlton Kings, Cheltenham, Gloucester GL53 8AA
CHI/23UB/LSC/2019/0128 · service charges · Cheltenham · decided 14 Apr 2020
The tribunal decided that the landlord's repairing covenants do not extend to the floor and non-load bearing walls, and that if damp proofing works went ahead to Flat 8, £29,412 would be payable through the service charge.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Charlton Lawn Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | J B Leitch Limited |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018, 2019 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | £39,605.56 |
| Total found payable | £29,412 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Applicant : Charlton Lawn Management Company Limited
- agent
Representative : J B Leitch Limited
- years
The works were budgeted for year 2018/19 but are likely to be carried out in 2019/20
- outcome
the sum of £29,412 would be payable by the Lessees by way of Service Charge
- items reduced
I determine that approximately 20% of the proposed works relate to matters not within the Lessors’ covenant
- total demanded
the amount at issue is said to be £39,605.56
- total payable
the sum of £29,412 would be payable by the Lessees by way of Service Charge
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.