Cestria Building, George Street, Chester, CH1 3ER
MAN/13UB/LDC/2021/0072 · dispensation from consultation · Cheshire West and Chester · decided 4 Aug 2022
The tribunal dispensed with the section 20 consultation requirements for intrusive fire safety inspection works needed to complete an EWS1 assessment of the Cestria Building, because the works should proceed urgently and no leaseholder objected.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Gorse Stacks Development Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 42 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a block of 42 apartments for residential use
- freeholder
The Applicant is the landlord of the Property.
- outcome
Compliance with the consultation requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is dispensed with in relation to works required to undertake the EWS1 process
- s20
Compliance with the consultation requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is dispensed with in relation to works required to undertake the EWS1 process
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.