Centurion House & Brecon House, Gunwharf Quays, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 3BQ
CHI/00MR/LDC/2021/0120 · dispensation from consultation · Portsmouth · decided 24 Feb 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord company dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the interim fire alarm system and the waking watch at Brecon House and Centurion Court, while noting that lessees remain free to challenge the charges later.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Gunwharf Quays Residents Co Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 44 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Applicant : [name] Residents Co Ltd
- outcome
the Tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements of Sch.1 and Pt.2 of Sch.4 to the Service Charges (Consultation Requirements) (England) Regulations 2003
- s20
the Tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements of Sch.1 and Pt.2 of Sch.4 to the Service Charges (Consultation Requirements) (England) Regulations 2003
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.