Centenary Mill, Preston PR1 5JQ
MAN/30UK/LDC/2022/0038 · dispensation from consultation · Preston · decided 16 Aug 2023
The tribunal granted the RTM company dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent repairs to the roof of the entrance hall at Centenary Mill, while leaseholders keep their right to challenge the costs later.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Homestead Consultancy Services Limited |
| Building | A block, 182 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
the Applicant's agent, Homestead Consultancy Services Limited
- outcome
The dispensation sought by the Applicant from compliance with section 20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is granted for the reasons set out herein.
- s20
In the circumstances the Tribunal is satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the requirements to comply with Section 20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 16 Aug 2023.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.