Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near PR1 5JH

Centenary Mill Court, New Hall Lane Preston PR1 5JH

MAN/30UK/LSC/2022/0039 · service charges · Preston · decided 31 Aug 2023

figures not yet checked

No plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedRTM company
Freeholder / landlordCentenary Mill Court (Preston) RTM Company Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentHomestead Consultancy Services
BuildingA block, 182 flats
Service charge years in dispute2019, 2020, 2021
Items in disputecleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£5,943.98
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
converted to approximately 182 flats
freeholder
[name] Court (Preston) RTM
agent
a managing agent, Homestead Consultancy Services
years
The years in dispute were 2019, 2020 and 2021
outcome
the service charges sought by the Applicant are
total demanded
service charge arrears of £5943.98
s20c
The Tribunal makes no order under s20C Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.