Cedar Place, 14 Bruce Grove, London, N17 6YT
LON/00AP/LDC/2023/0219 · dispensation from consultation · Haringey · decided 18 Dec 2023
The tribunal granted dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for forecourt improvement works to the Property, which Haringey Council is partly funding, with leaseholders paying 15% of the cost.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Cedar Place (Bruce Grove) Freehold Ltd |
| Management company | Place Residents Association (Bruce Grove) Limited |
| Managing agent | Barnard Cook London Ltd |
| Building | A block, 10 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into 10 flats with a forecourt at the front
- freeholder
Cedar Place (Bruce Grove) Freehold Ltd exists, with company number 11272202
- agent
The block management services are provided by [name] London Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation pursuant to section 20ZA of the
- s20
There is no evidence that the leaseholders were or will be prejudiced by the failure of the landlord to comply with the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.