Cedar Court, Pear Tree Drive, Great Barr, Birmingham, B43 6HP
BIR/00CS/LSC/2018/0016 · service charges · Sandwell · decided 22 Feb 2019
The Tribunal decided that the proposed roof recovering, fascia, soffit and rainwater goods works are Lessor's Expenses under the underleases and so are payable by the leaseholders through the service charge, while not deciding whether the proposed costs are reasonable.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Bithel Estates Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Bithel Estates Limited |
| Building | A block, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprises a development of 12 flats arranged over ground, first
- freeholder
Respondent 2 : Bithel Estates Limited
- years
As the works are planned for 2019
- outcome
It is clear to the Tribunal that the roof recovering works as set out in the Applicant’s submissions are Lessor’s Expenses as defined by the Underlease and, therefore, fall to be paid by the First Respondents
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.