Cavendish Court, 21-23 Bromley Road, Catford, London SE6 2TS
LON/00AZ/LSC/2021/0286 · service charges · Lewisham · decided 11 Jul 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the service charges demanded for 2017 to 2021 payable by the leaseholders, with the challenged items accepted as reasonable, and made no order under section 20C.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Prime Management |
| Building | An estate, 24 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, major works, management fees, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are 24 flats in total
- agent
Prime Management have been paid in accordance with their contract
- years
for the years 2017 – 2021 inclusive
- outcome
the service charges demanded by the Respondent are payable by the Applicants
- s20c
In the light of the determinations of this tribunal no order is made.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.