Castle Exchange, 41 Broad Street, Nottingham, NG1 3AP
· other · Nottingham · decided 11 Aug 2023
The tribunal granted the RTM company dispensation from the statutory section 20 consultation requirements for urgent fire-damage repair works at Castle Exchange, Nottingham.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Victoria Investments No.2 Ltd. |
| Management company | Castle Exchange RTM Company Ltd. |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 119 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Building is described as a multi-storey residential development of 119
- freeholder
Respondents 2 : Victoria Investments No.2 Ltd.
- management company
Applicant : Castle Exchange RTM Company Ltd.
- outcome
Therefore, dispensation is granted.
- s20
Therefore, dispensation is granted.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.