Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SW19 3RL

Cascades Court, 13-19 Hartfield Crescent, Wimbledon, SW19 3RL

LON/00BA/LDC/2025/0623 · dispensation from consultation · Merton · decided 31 Mar 2025

The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent repairs to a kitchen stack pipe, while leaving leaseholders free to challenge payability or reasonableness of the costs separately under section 27A.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordCascades Court Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingAn estate, 39 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The property comprises four blocks, including a total of 39 flats.
freeholder
Cascades Court Limited,
outcome
grants dispensation from the consultation requirements in respect of the works which are the subject of the application.
s20
grants dispensation from the consultation requirements in respect of the works which are the subject of the application.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.