Carlton Mount, 2 Cranborne Road, Bournemouth, Dorset BH2 5BR
CHI/00HN/LDC/2020/0065 · dispensation from consultation · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 9 Nov 2020
The tribunal granted the landlord's management company dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for additional urgent repairs to the timber balcony deck at Carlton Mount, but made no decision on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Carlton Mount Management (Bournemouth) Limited |
| Management company | Carlton Mount Management (Bournemouth) Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 23 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Respondents : 23 Leaseholders
- management company
Applicant : Carlton Mount Management (Bournemouth) Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal, therefore, dispenses with the consultation requirements in respect of the additional works to the timber deck.
- s20
The Tribunal, therefore, dispenses with the consultation requirements in respect of the additional works to the timber deck.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.