Carlton Mansions, 199-217 Randolph Avenue, London, W9 1NP
LON/00BK/LDC/2022/0004 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 29 Mar 2022
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent above ground drainage works to the lightwells at Carlton Mansions, with no terms imposed, leaving payability of the costs open for a later challenge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Carlton Mansions Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Burlington Estates |
| Building | An estate, 93 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Carlton Mansions is a substantial property containing 93 flats.
- freeholder
Applicant : Carlton Mansions Limited
- agent
Carlton Mansions is managed by Burlington Estates
- outcome
The Tribunal grants retrospective dispensation under
- s20
The Tribunal grants retrospective dispensation under
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.