Cambridge Retirement Park, Grimsby, DN34 5UU
MAN/00FC/LSC/2019/0011 · service charges · North East Lincolnshire · decided 23 Sep 2019
The tribunal found the service charges for 2014/5 to 2018/9 and the estimates for 2019/20 payable and reasonable, and ordered that the landlord's litigation costs cannot be added to the service charge and are extinguished as an administration charge.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate, 85 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2014, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Cambridge Park, which comprises 85 units
- years
The service charges for service charge years 2014/5 to 2018/9 as set out below are payable
- outcome
The service charges for service charge years 2014/5 to 2018/9 as set out below are payable
- s20c
under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, the Respondent’s costs in connection with these proceedings are not to be regarded as relevant costs
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.