CAM/26UG/LDC/2026/0023
CAM/26UG/LDC/2026/0023 · dispensation from consultation · St Albans · decided 12 Jun 2026
The tribunal dispensed with the statutory consultation requirements for the lift refurbishment and electrical controls works at West Hall, because the leaseholders were not shown to have been prejudiced by the landlord's failure to consult.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Monde Property Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 40 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £32,252.40 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a detached five storey residential building with 40 private dwellings
- freeholder
Applicant : Monde Property Ltd
- outcome
to dispense with all the consultation requirements in relation to the works described in the application form and application bundle
- total demanded
The total estimated cost of the works is said to be £32,252.40 (inclusive of VAT).
- s20
I am satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the statutory consultation requirements in relation to the relevant works.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.