CAM/22UC/LDC/2025/0655 - The Timber Yard, Station Approach, Braintree, Essex, CM7 3TB
CAM/22UC/LDC/2025/0655 · dispensation from consultation · Braintree · decided 6 Oct 2025
The Tribunal granted the landlord's application to dispense with the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent replacement of the waste pump, finding leaseholders suffered no significant prejudice.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Southern Land Securities Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Together Property Management |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The landlord is Southern Land Securities Limited.
- agent
The Applicant is the managing agent of the Property
- outcome
The Tribunal grants an order dispensing with the consultation requirements imposed under section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of works to replace the waste pump.
- s20
The Tribunal therefore makes an order that the consultation requirements are dispensed with in respect of the replacement of a new water pump as set out within the Application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.