CAM/00KF/LSC/2025/0613
CAM/00KF/LSC/2025/0613 · service charges · Southend-on-Sea · decided 19 Nov 2025
The tribunal found most disputed service charges for 2019 to 2026 reasonable and payable by the leaseholders, disallowed the garden furniture and portal charges, and deferred the electricity issue and any section 20C or fee reimbursement orders to a later decision.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Wallace Estates Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
2. Wallace Estates Limited
- agent
Premier Block Management Limited
- years
service charge years 2019 - 2026 inclusive
- outcome
Accordingly, any sum sought under this heading is disallowed.
- items reduced
Therefore, the Tribunal disallows service charges in respect of Portal Charges for all years referred to under the Application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.