Cable House, Cheapside, Liverpool, L2 2SX
MAN/00BY/LDC/2021/0006 · dispensation from consultation · Liverpool · decided 19 Apr 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent fire detection and fire alarm installation work at Cable House, Liverpool.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Tuscola (110) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Epworth PM Limited |
| Building | A block, 51 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 51 apartments with lower and ground floor car parks
- freeholder
The Applicant is the Freeholder and Successor to the Lessor of the Leases of the apartments at the Property.
- agent
Representative : Epworth PM Limited
- outcome
We conclude it reasonable in accordance with Section 20ZA(1) of the Act to dispense with the consultation requirements
- s20
The Applicant is dispensed from complying with the consultation requirements in respect of the work specified in the application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.