Burgess House, 6 St Lukes Road, Whyteleafe, CR3 0ES
HAV/43UK/LDC/2026/0030 · dispensation from consultation · Tandridge · decided 14 Apr 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for replacing the flat roof at Burgess House, on condition that its legal costs of the application are not charged to leaseholders, while leaseholders keep their right to challenge the costs later under section 27A.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 9 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant's legal costs of the dispensation application not to be charged to the leaseholders, including through the |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising nine flats over three floors
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for the dispensation of all or any of the consultation requirements provided for by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal grants the application for the dispensation of all or any of the consultation requirements provided for by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (Section 20ZA of the same Act) in relation to works to replace the flat roof at the Property.
- costs
The dispensation is conditional on none of the Applicant’s legal costs in applying for dispensation being charged to the leaseholders of the Property, including through the service charge.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.