Browning Court, Fenham Chase, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, Tyne & Wear NE4 9DR
MAN/00CJ/LDC/2025/0653 · dispensation from consultation · Newcastle upon Tyne · decided 27 Jan 2026
The tribunal granted unconditional retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for lift remedial works carried out on 5 October 2024, because no leaseholder identified any relevant prejudice.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | McCarthy & Stone Retirement Lifestyles Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Stone Management Services Limited |
| Building | A block, 36 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is a purpose built block of 36 flats
- freeholder
The Applicant is the freehold proprietor of the Property
- outcome
the tribunal makes a determination to dispense with the requirement to consult with the Respondents on
- s20
the tribunal makes a determination to dispense with the requirement to consult with the Respondents on
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.