Brook Court, Savages Wood Road, Bradley Stoke, Bristol, BS32 9AA
CHI/00HD/LSC/2019/0125 · service charges · South Gloucestershire · decided 25 Apr 2020
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found most of the disputed Brook Court service charges payable but disallowed the £640 software recharges as a separate cost, and made an order that 20% of the landlord's tribunal costs cannot be added to future service charges.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | McCarthy and Stone Retirement Lifestyles Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | McCarthy and Stone Management Services Limited |
| Building | A block, 50 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
It contains 50 flats and common parts.
- freeholder
[name] Retirement Lifestyles Limited, is the Landlord of the long leaseholder apartment owners
- agent
manages the development on behalf of the Respondent
- years
for the service charge years ending 31 March 2017, 31 March 2018 and 31 March 2019
- outcome
that this sum is not recoverable as a separate service charge cost in respect of this development.
- items reduced
that this sum is not recoverable as a separate service charge cost in respect of this development.
- s20c
The Tribunal orders under section 20C of the 1985 Act that 20% of the Landlord’s costs incurred in connection with the present Tribunal proceedings shall not be treated as relevant costs
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.