Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near BN20 7EU

Broad Oaks, 32 Silverdale Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex BN20 7EU

CHI/21UC/LSC/2020/0004 · service charges · Eastbourne · decided 8 Jul 2020

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found that the service charge accounts for 2014 to 2019 amounted to a certificate under clause 7 of the lease, so the leaseholders' challenge to the demands failed and no section 20C order was made.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 11 flats
Service charge years in dispute2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019
Items in disputeinsurance, management fees, reserve fund
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The Property consists of 11 purpose-built flats.
freeholder
The Respondent is the freeholder
years
for the period 2014 to 2019 inclusive
outcome
Given our determination above the Applicants challenge fails.
s20c
we exercise our discretion and decline to make any order

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.