Brindley House, Newhall Street, Birmingham, B3 1LL
BIR/00CN/LDC/2020/0003 · dispensation from consultation · Birmingham · decided 8 Sep 2020
The tribunal granted dispensation from most section 20 consultation requirements for a fire alarm system at Brindley House, provided a combined notice is served on leaseholders 7 days before the works start.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Wallace Estates Limited |
| Management company | Brindley House RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 182 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
All 182 apartments, including 2 penthouses, are subject to long leases
- freeholder
Respondent (2) : Wallace Estates Limited
- management company
Applicant : Brindley House RTM Company Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that it is reasonable to dispense with the Consultation Procedure in all respects
- s20
The Tribunal determines that it is reasonable to dispense with the Consultation Procedure in all respects
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.