Bridge Hill House, Higham Lane, Bridge, Canterbury, Kent, CT4 5AY
CHI/29UC/LIS/2021/0046 · LIS · Canterbury · decided 29 Jun 2022
The tribunal found most of the 2019 and 2020 service charges payable in full, reducing only the accountancy fees and adjusting some amounts to match the year-end accounts, and granted dispensation from parts of the consultation requirements for the South East Timber and Damp works.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Bridge Hill House Management Company Limited |
| Management company | Bridge Hill House Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into seven self-contained residential units
- freeholder
Applicant : Bridge Hill House
- years
2019 and 2020
- outcome
Save for the modest reduction in cost for accountants
- items reduced
Save for the modest reduction in cost for accountants
- s20
I am prepared to grant dispensation from:
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.