Bridge Hill House, Higham Lane, Bridge, Canterbury, Kent CT4 5AY
CHI/29UC/LAM/2021/0012 · appointment of a manager · Canterbury · decided 14 Sep 2022
No plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Bridge Hill House Management Co. Ltd. |
| Management company | Bridge Hill House Management Co. Ltd. |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate, 7 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, legal and professional fees, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into 7 flats
- freeholder
The Respondent is the freehold owner of the property and is also the management company set out in the leases.
- management company
(1) Bridge Hill House Management Co. Ltd.
- outcome
The Tribunal refuses the application to appoint [name] FCCA MAE as manager of the property.
- s20c
The Tribunal refuses to make orders pursuant to Section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.