Brecon Lodge West Drayton Uxbridge UB7 9GR
LON/00AS/LDC/2026/0099 · dispensation from consultation · Hillingdon · decided 28 Jul 2026
The tribunal granted the management company retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the EV charging installation works to the car park, which were urgent because of a government grant deadline.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Drayton Garden Village Estate Management Company Limited |
| Management company | Drayton Garden Village Estate Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | Ringley Limited |
| Building | A block, 87 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the Property is a residential block of 87 flats
- freeholder
Management Company Limited
- agent
[name] Limited (who trade as [name] Chartered Surveyors) who are appointed by the applicant as managing agents of the Property
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for retrospective dispensation in respect
- s20
The Tribunal grants the application for retrospective dispensation in respect
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.