Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SR1 2AU

Bodlewell House, High Street East, Sunderland SR1 2AU

MAN/00CM/LRM/2018/0010 · right to manage · Sunderland · decided 13 May 2019

The tribunal found that the Applicant residents' company acquired the right to manage Bodlewell House because the non-residential part of the building did not exceed 25% of its floor area, so the respondent's counter-notice objection failed.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedRTM company
Freeholder / landlordGround Rent Trading Limited
Management companyBodlewell House RTM Company Limited
Managing agentMoreland Estate Management
BuildingA block, 6 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputecleaning and grounds
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
a lease dated 30 November 2018 between Ground Rent Trading Limited (1) and The Student Hotel Limited (2)
management company
Applicant : Bodlewell House RTM Company Limited
agent
a letter dated 26 December 2018 from Moreland Estate Management for the Respondent
outcome
the Applicant has acquired the right to manage the Property as set out in its Notice of Claim dated 14 September 2018

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.