Bloom House, Chestnut Apartment, Arcacia House and Alameda Place, London, E3 2ZN
LON/00BG/LDC/2025/0911 · dispensation from consultation · Tower Hamlets · decided 28 Sep 2026
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the urgent replacement of the inverter at Bloom House after a fire, making no finding that the scope or cost of the works is reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Miller (GRF) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] (GRF) Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal granted the application for the following main reasons:
- s20
Applicant’s failure to carry out consultation
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.