Blocks B, C, D Maltings Close, London E3 3TE
LON/00BG/LRM/2025/0015 · right to manage · Tower Hamlets · decided 22 Sep 2025
The Tribunal struck out the right to manage application because the notices were invalid, so no valid claim notice was given and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Chime Properties Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Urang Property Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 170 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021, 2022, 2024, 2025 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The freeholder for the development is the third respondent, Chime Properties Ltd ("Chime").
- outcome
The application is struck out under Rule 9(2)(a) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, because the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in relation to the proceedings or case.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.