Blocks A-B Norman Road, Blocks C-G Tarves Way and the Old Pearson Block (Eight blocks forming part of the development known as New Haddo, Greenwich, London SE10 9JP
LON/00AL/LSC/2020/0184 · service charges · Greenwich · decided 18 Dec 2020
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the cost of a waking watch and a new fire alarm system recoverable in principle under the leases, the waking watch costs to 30 August 2020 reasonably incurred, the fire alarm works properly consulted on, and refused the landlord's cost-protection applications.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
(1) RMB 102 Limited
- years
in respect of the service charge years 2020 and 2021.
- s20c
The application for an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 so that none of the Applicants’ costs of the Tribunal proceedings may be passed to the Respondents through any service charge is refused.
- s20
the Tribunal therefore concluded that if an application had been made for dispensation from the consultation requirements in this case it would have been granted without condition.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.