Blocks 1-16, 17-32, 33-48, 49-64, 65-80 Abbey Court, Whitley, Coventry, CV3 4BA
BIR/00CQ/LDC/2021/0022 · dispensation from consultation · Coventry · decided 30 Mar 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the consultation requirements for clearing the estate roads, drives and waste inside the garages, but refused it for the structural removal of garage walls, roofs and doors.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Marden Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Loveitts Limited |
| Building | A block, 80 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
five blocks of low rise flats, 80 in total
- agent
the landlord's managing agents, Loveitts Limited
- years
the landlord arranged for work to be carried out early in 2021
- outcome
Dispensation granted
- items reduced
3) structural work comprising removal of walls, roofs and doors from the garages. Dispensation refused.
- s20
Therefore, the Tribunal grants dispensation in respect of the items covered by [name] Enterprises Ltd.'s invoice of 17th February 2021.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.