Block D New Palace Place and Others London, SW1P
LON/00BK/LDC/2021/0202 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 14 Jan 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the re-cladding and balcony and associated fire prevention works at Block D, New Palace Place.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Blenheims Estate and Asset Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 40 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
containing, we were told, 40 flats and commercial premises at ground floor level
- agent
Ms [name] – [name] Representative : [name] for Blenheims Estate and Asset Management Limited
- outcome
We determine that dispensation should be granted from the consultation requirements under s20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
We determine that dispensation should be granted from the consultation requirements under s20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.