Block B, Royal Naval Hospital, Queens Road, Great Yarmouth, NR30 3JU
CAM/33UD/LDC/2025/0674 · dispensation from consultation · Great Yarmouth · decided 19 Jan 2026
The tribunal refused the applicant's application for dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for roof repair works to Block B, so the statutory £250 per leaseholder cap applies to those works.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation refused |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Naval Hospital Gardens Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to meet its own costs of the application, recoverable as service charge and/or administration charge if th |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : The Naval Hospital Gardens Ltd.
- outcome
The Tribunal does NOT grant dispensation from the requirements on the applicant to consult all leaseholders under S.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
in this case, the application is refused.
- costs
The applicant will meet all of its costs arising from the making and determination of this application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.