Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near NR35 2SA

Block A, The Maltings, 13-23 (Odds) Pirnhow Street, Ditchingham, Norfolk NR35 2SA

CAM/33UH/LDC/2025/0663 · dispensation from consultation · South Norfolk · decided 12 Nov 2025

The tribunal granted the landlord's management company dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent repairs to a leaking balcony in Block A, which cost £5,432.40 inclusive of VAT.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordThe Maltings Leasehold Management Company Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentTrinity Estates Property Management
BuildingA block, 9 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£5,432.40
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The 11-year-old Property comprises 9 flats
freeholder
The Maltings Leasehold Management
agent
Trinity Estates Property Management
outcome
The Tribunal is satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with compliance with all
total demanded
The cost is £5,432.40 inclusive of VAT.
s20
The Tribunal is satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with compliance with all

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.