Block A, 417 Wick Lane, London E3 2JG
LON/00BG/LDC/2020/0151 · dispensation from consultation · Tower Hamlets · decided 4 Dec 2020
The tribunal granted the RTM company dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for both the emergency and permanent roof works at Block A, 417 Wick Lane.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | 417 Wick Lane RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 86 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 86 residential flats and designated car parking spaces
- management company
Applicant : 417 Wick Lane RTM Company Limited
- outcome
The tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the Emergency Roof Works and the proposed permanent Roof Works.
- s20
The tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the Emergency Roof Works and the proposed permanent Roof Works.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.