Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near BN1 3GS

Beves House, Dyke Road, Brighton, BN1 3GS

HAV/00ML/LSC/2025/0692 · service charges · Brighton and Hove · decided 2 Feb 2026

figures not yet checked

The Tribunal decided it had no jurisdiction to determine the personal heating and hot water charges because they are not service charges under section 18 of the 1985 Act, so the application was dismissed, and it made no costs order.

OutcomeDismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordClarion Housing Association
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 14 flats
Service charge years in dispute2023, 2024
Items in disputeutilities
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
comprises a purpose-built block of 14 flats
years
the dispute related only to charges made in 2023-24 and 2024-25 estimated
outcome
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to determine the Applicants’ personal heating and hot water charges
s20c
No order is made under s.20C LTA 1985 or under para 5A of Sch.11 CALRA 2002.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.