Berkeley Court, 1 - 9 Wilmington Square, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN21 4DX
HAV/21UC/LDC/2025/0782 · dispensation from consultation · Eastbourne · decided 10 Feb 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord Berkeley Court Limited dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for emergency refurbishment of the passenger lift serving Tower 1, while leaseholders keep their right to challenge the reasonableness of the costs under section 27A.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Berkeley Court Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 57 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is described as a purpose built block housing 57 flats.
- freeholder
Applicant : Berkeley Court Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for the dispensation of all or any of the consultation requirements provided for by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
It is evident that a statutorily compliant consultation has not been carried out by the Applicant.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.