Bell Vue heights, 37-39 Wells Road, Malvern, Worcestershire, WR14 4RJ
BIR/47UC/LSC/2019/0006 · service charges · Malvern Hills · decided 6 Feb 2020
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal decided that the estimated costs of the proposed balcony damp-proofing works are not reasonable, because the quotations were based on a flawed specification that assumed timber balcony floors when they are concrete beam and block.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Heritage (Colwall) Developments Ltd |
| Management company | Belle Vue Heights LLP |
| Managing agent | Taylor Clarke Ltd |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £46,860 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicants (Freeholders & Landlords) : [name] (Colwall) Developments Ltd
- management company
Management Company : Belle Vue Heights LLP
- agent
Representative : [name] Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the costs to be incurred for the Proposed Works are not reasonable.
- total demanded
£23,430.00 per balcony including VAT being a total of £46,860.00 for both balconies
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.