Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near M3 4LQ

Beetham Tower, 301 Deansgate, Manchester, M3 4LQ

MAN/00BN/LDC/2025/0665 · dispensation from consultation · Manchester · decided 27 May 2026

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent replacement of pipework at Beetham Tower, and the decision must be served on each leaseholder directly rather than only through the agent's portal.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordDeansgate Freehold Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentRendall and Rittner Limited
BuildingA block, 219 flats
Service charge years in dispute2025
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
comprising of 219 residential flats and a 260-room hotel
freeholder
Applicant : Deansgate Freehold Limited
agent
represented by their managing agents Rendall and Rittner Limited
outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of
s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 under section 20ZA of that Act

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.