Beaumont Court, Victoria Road, Southend on Sea Essex SS2 6EB
CAM/00KF/LIS/2020/0007 · LIS · Southend-on-Sea · decided 29 Dec 2020
The tribunal reduced the 2018/19 insurance premium and the B&R management fee, disallowed gym equipment leasing and several invoices and accounting costs, and deferred its decision on whether to make a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Randal Watts London Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate, 52 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
the Respondent landlord, Randal [name] London Limited
- years
the y/e 31st March 2019 and 31st March 2020
- outcome
that the recoverable sum should be reduced to the same amount as is claimed in respect of 19/20
- items reduced
The landlord accepted that it was not entitled, in addition, to render an invoice in the sum of £2,859.00 and we disallow that sum.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.