Beatty Court, Holland Walk, Nantwich, CW5 5UW
MAN/00EQ/LDC/2024/0044 · dispensation from consultation · Cheshire East · decided 24 Dec 2024
The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the roof repairs at Beatty Court, but only takes effect once conditions, including funding a single expert report for the flat owners, have been met.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | McCarthy & Stone Retirement Lifestyles Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | McCarthy and Stone Management Services |
| Building | A block, 63 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the owners of the 63 apartments within the property
- freeholder
The Applicant : [name]
- agent
Since 1 March 2015 [name] Management Services (“MSMS”)
- outcome
The Tribunal has determined that the statutory consultation requirements relating to the works can only reasonably be dispensed
- s20
The Tribunal has therefore determined to grant dispensation but only to be
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.