Bayheath House, Wakefield, WF1 1DH
MAN/00DB/LDC/2024/0055 · dispensation from consultation · Wakefield · decided 4 Dec 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for replacing the rear entrance door and three fire doors at Bayheath House, Wakefield, because the works were urgent for safety and security and no leaseholder objected.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | RMB 102 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Premier Estates Limited |
| Building | A block, 31 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
which comprises 31 apartments with parking to the rear and external fire escape
- freeholder
RMB 102 Limited, the freeholder and landlord
- agent
Application dated 31 July 2024 was made by Premier Estates Limited, as managing agent on behalf of RMB 102 Limited
- outcome
Dispensation for the Works described in paragraph 4 is granted pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
- s20
Dispensation for the Works described in paragraph 4 is granted pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.