Bayfort Mansions, Warren Road, Torquay, TQ2 5TN
CHI/00HH/LDC/2023/0077 · dispensation from consultation · Torbay · decided 25 Sep 2023
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the urgent replacement of a supporting beam at Bayfort Mansions, finding the leaseholders suffered no relevant prejudice.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Bay Fort Mansions (Management Company) Limited |
| Managing agent | Blenheims Estate and Asset Management SW Ltd |
| Building | A block, 16 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into 16 residential flats
- management company
Applicant : [name] Mansions (Management
- agent
Blenheims Estate and Asset Management SW Ltd (“the agent”)
- outcome
The Tribunal grants an order dispensing with the
- s20
The Tribunal grants an order dispensing with the consultation requirements under S.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the replacement of the supporting beam.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.