Batworth Park House, Crossbush, Arundel BN18 9PG
CHI/45UC/LCP/2019/0001 · LCP · Arun · decided 17 Dec 2019
The tribunal decided that the landlord can recover £1810.30 in costs from the three right to manage companies, disallowing costs incurred before claim notices were served, costs of the previous tribunal, and some director and administrative time.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Fountain Retirement Housing Association |
| Management company | Batworth Park House (1-9) RTM Co. Ltd |
| Managing agent | RTMF Services Limited |
| Building | An estate |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £2,926.20 |
| Total found payable | £1,810.30 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The Applicant is the freeholder of the Property.
- management company
[name] Park House (1-9) RTM Co. Ltd
- outcome
The tribunal determines that the sum recoverable by the Applicant from the three Respondent companies on a joint and several basis is £1810.30.
- total demanded
The application claims costs of £2926.20.
- total payable
The tribunal determines that the sum recoverable by the Applicant from the three Respondent companies on a joint and several basis is £1810.30.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.