Baslow Court, 25 Baslow Road, Eastbourne, BN20 7UL
CHI/21UC/LDC/2023/0168 · dispensation from consultation · Eastbourne · decided 11 Jan 2024
No plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Baslow Court (Eastbourne) Management Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | Prestige Property Management Ltd |
| Building | A block, 11 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
purpose built residential block of 11 flats
- management company
Prestige Property Management Ltd have managed the property on behalf of [name] Court (Eastbourne) Management Company Ltd
- agent
Representative : Prestige Property Management Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of replacement of the sea facing roof slope.
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of replacement of the sea facing roof slope.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.