Basement Flat and Flat 120A, 120 Nevill Road, London N16 0SX
LON/00AM/LSC/2020/0071 · service charges · Hackney · decided 26 Mar 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found building insurance and reserve fund demands reasonable, reduced general repairs, health and safety inspection and some management and professional fees, and refused the section 20C application.
| Outcome | Substantially reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Remus Management |
| Building | A block, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2010 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance, legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | legal and professional fees, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The properties comprise the two flats into which the house at 120 Nevill was divided
- agent
Mr [name], of Remus Representative : Management
- years
service charge years from 1 October 2010 to 30 September 2019
- outcome
The number and frequency of health and safety inspections and reports undertaken was not reasonable
- items reduced
In all other respects, the fees referred to above were reasonably incurred.
- s20c
we do not consider that in these circumstances it would be right to shut the Respondent out of what would otherwise be its contractual rights under the leases.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.