Basement Flat, 69 St Aubyns, Hove, BN3 2TL
CHI/00ML/LBC/2020/0012 · breach of lease · Brighton and Hove · decided 30 Jun 2020
The Tribunal struck out the Applicants' application for a determination that the Respondent breached the lease by altering the flat, finding it an abuse of process brought to obstruct the enfranchisement claim, and made no costs award.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 5 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016, 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are 5 self contained flats in the building
- freeholder
Interested Party : 69 St Aubyns Ltd
- outcome
The application under section 168(4) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (“the 2002 Act”) is struck out as being both an abuse of process and having little likelihood of success
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.